The robbery and the prison sentence
Steve Rothwell (Guest) · 17:26
It's an extra— like, for most people, that's an extraordinary leap, saying, I've got a problem to solve, right? I can see other people solving it this way. I think I'll give that a try. Like, as opposed— using that lot, you know, decision tree, as opposed to the decision tree that says, oh, most people think this is wrong, I probably should, you know, consider the consequences, right? So you've got a compulsion You end up trying, trying—
John Milham (Host) · 17:55
how would—
Steve Rothwell (Guest) · 17:56
like, you're a smart guy. How, how was the planning and process of the robbery?
John Milham (Host) · 18:01
Almost none. Um, well, almost none. And because I also had another OCD subroutine going around in my head that I've probably got AIDS anyway and I'm gonna die, and I had no, no reason to believe that that's the case. And so there was this fatalistic— so I think what was happening is my mind was trying to establish a case doing this to override the natural. I mean, never at any stage was that something that I wanted to do.
Steve Rothwell (Guest) · 18:35
Um, you weren't a shoplifter, or, you know, you didn't have an uncle who was like shifty, or, you know, like—
John Milham (Host) · 18:41
no, no, no, no. It's, um, I had a grandfather who was always a trader in all matters, and then what ended up he had a business partner who was a little bit shady, and the local Bobby said, you better get out of town because he's going to shop you. So he was a bit of a, bit of a wily campaigner, but I think he was always this side of the law. But I think that really, I suppose there were, there were 3 ways that I could have gone at that time. But they would have either been suicide or mental hospital or prison, and that much was absolutely certain.
Steve Rothwell (Guest) · 19:33
So we know now, and as you, you have worked with, um, uh, men who have been imprisoned and so on, so, um, we know now that a lot of men are, you know, who are incarcerated have some form of, say, neurodiversity or some diagnosable challenge or head injury. So acquired brain injuries are prevalent. What do you think? Why do you think that ends up being so counter to sort of taking options that are more socially acceptable.
John Milham (Host) · 20:18
I could just say that your mic's gone a little bit quiet there again. Um, I'm not quite sure if it's movable or, or anything like that, but I think the, the question was why do I think that they—
Steve Rothwell (Guest) · 20:34
I, I think it's, yeah, men, men end up in prison who have, you know, often have some form of, of challenge, psycho-emotional challenge, or, you know, injury, um, you know, trauma or abuse or, you know, neglect, as well as other things. Why do you think that happens? You know, like, why does society tend to funnel men into trouble that way instead of intervening in a positive way?
John Milham (Host) · 21:05
Well, I think that the range of allowable behavior in terms of the vocational ladder and things like that is so prescribed. Um, you've got to turn up every day. Um, and so what happens is like knocking over dominoes. You start off with a full set of dominoes, which is assumed at birth, whatever, and then different dominoes are knocked over with— you've got particular proclivities or you've got particular impediments. And so we can knock over the domino of being able to turn up to work every day on time if you've got mental illnesses which go up and down in a sine wave. So first and foremost, those guys— nobody's told them this, but the best thing they can do is to have something like an eBay shop or to do something that's independent, and by so doing they can be employed and, and have a sense of self-worth, and it allows for the ups and downs. So first of all, you're not allowed to have any ups and downs, so anybody with any degree of mental impairment, um, is, is going to have a problem there. And then secondly, people who are neurodiverse or people who have got tremendous sensitivities, just something like the, the glare of lighting in typical workplaces, the amount of noise, the amount of chaos, they can't cope with that. And so there goes another domino drop down. And so what it is, I think, is that people measure themselves against the challenge of holding down a full-time job or even a part-time job. And then what happens is they fall at the hurdles that I've just, uh, mentioned, and of which there are many, many, many more. And so in answer to your question, what can be done better to help these people? Well, I think that something along the lines of encouraging them to do something which isn't trying to squeeze them into a 40-hour week or whatever. Because unfortunately, even with the best medication and what have you, which a lot of these guys are never going to get anyway, they're not going to be able to fit into that mold. And, and that's a tremendously isolating and, um, But it's a, it's a, it's a terrible, terrible feeling that you can't even hold down a sort of low-level job. Yeah. And so I think a lot of people, they never set out to be criminals, but they're just looking for a way out.
Steve Rothwell (Guest) · 24:16
That's, um, so much insight in there. And of course, you know, it's not just, you know, the environment that creates barriers. Of course, you know, you mentioned, you know, school can be problematic, you know, and that level of positive reinforcement, you know, you're, you know, people are already sensitive to being different. And yet, you know, like I was reading some research recently that by the age of 10, a neurodiverse child has heard 10,000 more negative comments about their behavior or their capacity, right, than a neurotypical child. That must, you know, having, you know, neurodiversity myself, I recall those with, you know, still some sensitivity, right? And then so it's amazing that more of us don't end up in challenging places, right?
John Milham (Host) · 25:12
Of course.
Steve Rothwell (Guest) · 25:13
But I cannot imagine how hard— were you frightened as a young man being given a 3-year sentence and going into jail? Was that a frightening experience?
John Milham (Host) · 25:25
Yeah, it's absolutely terrifying. And yet I did have a sense while I was there that this was in some way preordained. I went through the process of it and it was almost as if I— this was always going to happen. And so to begin with, at least, that's what it is. But the actual pain of being inside, it reaches such an intensity that what happens is your mind switches off. At a certain point and you're in a state of suspended animation. And I can remember going for periods of months where you would never see another human being smile. And all that does is, if we look at, if we go down, back down to the basic, the basics, what led these guys to go and get in trouble in the first place? They'd had no kindness showed towards them, and then they go inside and then they've had brutality showed towards them. And so that at least explains high rates of recidivism, because they go back into society which is at best indifferent to their existence, uh, certainly not encouraging, and just, I don't know, a few words of encouragement or kindness from probation officers, from anybody. I've seen it myself. Somebody, they, who is seen as being a bit of a hard case and nobody can reach him or whatever. Well, you know, almost every, everybody can be reached given the right stimulus, given the right encouragement or whatever. But I think that predominantly there's just no kindness, there's just cruelty. Your mind switches off. You can't absorb the enormity of it because otherwise it's like a bomb going off inside your head all day.